Yes, and I don't like playing secondies either. They beat me to it did they? Can I get a link please? Basically, if you look at the IV what you have for cleavage on the IV works very well because the entire cleavage is molded in a standard way which allows far more control of detail. Which is why the IV is the only current femskin with details like a bit of abs and some neckline. By standard I mean JUST the cleavage and detailed areas, the mold itself is far from standard. It's a mix of inside-out and standard. This next go is going to bring that same technique to everything that should have some detail orientation. So, on the IV that was really about cleavage, but, one thing leads to another and it looks baaaad if I smooth out straight from the boobies so I made just a little neck and belly and smoothed out from there. On this new suit the smooth bits will be the bits that should be smooth and everything else will have some detail to it. So, for example, a profile shot will show some nice smooth skin on the side of your body, but, a behind shot is going to show a more detailed butt than y'all are used to seeing out of me. That sort of thing. The only thing truly new I plan to bring to this suit is a better vagina. I was quiet about the vagina placement of the V because to highlight it is to show off a flaw in my other works. Femskin I, II, III, and IV all have front facing vaginas. Everyone else I've seen does too. Because the mold has to split someplace you have to choose a side and since where the vagina on a women lays is also a point with a round on it even if you make the left side come into the right a bit all you've created is a mold lock. Everyone's vaginas are a bit forward except my Femskin V. That Vagina is 100% dead on between the legs and faces the floor like a woman's does. So how do I improve that? Tell you what else every vagina has is a set position. All my vaginas are open, so, when you close your legs you vagina tries to close up too but it can't because it's a mold of a real vagina and the lady had her legs open, it is molded open and so you're not shutting a vagina you're trying to force rubber molded in one way to shrink into another. That will never happen. What I see elsewhere is decisions made. Sometimes it's a vagina molded open, sometimes it is molded closed and when you open it, it too does not look right because it's an un-open-able vagina being stretched. Solution, make a vagina that at rest closes itself up and when the legs spread it opens as well. More natty-like. More realistic. Like placement, this isn't currently done by anyone because no one has figured it out. I'm telling y'all, I'm putting your balls in your back pocket with this one, and, back pocket is where they will stay. So, obviously it's not as simple as take from the IV, the V has her own boobies that require their own shaping, but the technique for how to fill comes from the IV, AND, I might add, so does roanyer's technique. They didn't have a prefill option before me, and, that's because I'm the crazy fool who invented the technique. So, yes, exactly like theirs, but let's not call me the rip off, I'm the OG here. Not as simple as taking the V's vagina but the technique to it is. In fact, I've not said it because I don't know how it's going to work out, but, I plan to do a fat layer entirely. Skin to fat layer and the fat layer fills in the bits like butt and boobs. Encapsulated. More definition, more parts, more customization options, all around buds, I can't think of ANYTHING to add but a mask. Which I will do, but, I think it's obvious why I'm making a closing vagina and not a mask yet. On thing leads to another, my vagina will move properly and that technique will lend itself to how my eyes work when I make my masks.